William I "the Conqueror" King of ENGLAND

Birth:
14 Oct 1027
Falais, Calvados, France
Death:
9 Sep 1087
Hermenbraville, Seine-Maritime, France
Burial:
Abbey of St Step, Caen, Calvados, France
Marriage:
Abt 1053
Eu, Seine-Inferieure, France
Sources:
The Magna Charta Sureties 1215, Frederick Lewis Weis, additions by WalterLee Sheppard Jr, 5th Edition, 1999, 161-9
Burke's Peerage & Baronetage, 106th Edition, Charles MosleyEditor-in-Chief, 1999, cxiv
Encyclopedia Britannica, Treatise on, William I
GEDCOM File : ~AT1255.ged
Notes:
                   William I, byname WILLIAM The CONQUEROR, or The BASTARD, or WILLIAM ofNORMANDY, French GUILLAUME le CONQUÉRANT, or le BÂTARD, or GUILLAUME deNORMANDIE (b. c. 1028, Falaise, Normandy--d. Sept. 9, 1087, Rouen), dukeof Normandy (as William II) from 1035 and king of England from 1066, oneof the greatest soldiers and rulers of the Middle Ages. He made himselfthe mightiest feudal lord in France and then changed the course ofEngland's history by his conquest of that country.

Early years

William was the elder of two children of Robert I of Normandy and hisconcubine Herleva, or Arlette, the daughter of a burgher from the town ofFalaise. In 1035 Robert died when returning from a pilgrimage toJerusalem, and William, his only son, whom he had nominated as his heirbefore his departure, was accepted as duke by the Norman magnates and hisfeudal overlord, King Henry I of France. William and his friends had toovercome enormous obstacles. His illegitimacy (he was generally known asthe Bastard) was a handicap, and he had to survive the collapse of lawand order that accompanied his accession as a child.

Three of William's guardians died violent deaths before he grew up, andhis tutor was murdered. His father's kin were of little help; most ofthem thought that they stood to gain by the boy's death. But his mothermanaged to protect William through the most dangerous period. These earlydifficulties probably contributed to his strength of purpose and hisdislike of lawlessness and misrule.

Ruler of Normandy.

By 1042, when William reached his 15th year, was knighted, and began toplay a personal part in the affairs of his duchy, the worst was over. Buthis attempts to recover rights lost during the anarchy and to bringdisobedient vassals and servants to heel inevitably led to trouble. From1046 until 1055 he dealt with a series of baronial rebellions, mostly ledby kinsmen. Occasionally he was in great danger and had to rely on Henryof France for help. In 1047 Henry and William defeated a coalition ofNorman rebels at Val-ès-Dunes, southeast of Caen. It was in these yearsthat William learned to fight and rule.

William soon learned to control his youthful recklessness. He was alwaysready to take calculated risks on campaign and, most important, to fighta battle. But he was not a chivalrous or flamboyant commander. His planswere simple, his methods direct, and he exploited ruthlessly anyadvantage gained. If he found himself at a disadvantage, he withdrewimmediately. He showed the same
qualities in his government. He never lost sight of his aim to recoverlost ducal rights and revenues, and, although he developed no theory ofgovernment or great interest in administrative techniques, he was alwaysprepared to improvise and experiment. He seems to have lived a moral lifeby the standards of the time, and he acquired an interest in the welfareof the Norman church. He made his half brother, Odo, bishop of Bayeux in1049 at the age of about 16, and Odo managed to combine the roles ofnobleman and prelate in a way that did not greatly shock contemporaries.But William also welcomed foreign monks and scholars to Normandy.Lanfranc of Pavia, a famous master of the liberal arts, who entered themonastery of Bec about 1042, was made abbot of Caen in 1063.

According to a brief description of William's person by an anonymousauthor, who borrowed extensively from Einhard's Life of Charlemagne, hewas just above average height and had a robust, thick-set body. Though hewas always sparing of food and drink, he became fat in later life. He hada rough bass voice and was a good and ready speaker. Writers of the nextgeneration agree that he was exceptionally strong and vigorous. Williamwas an out-of-doors man, a hunter and soldier, fierce and despotic,generally feared; uneducated, he had few graces but was intelligent andshrewd and soon obtained the respect of his rivals.

New alliances.

After 1047 William began to take part in events outside his duchy. Insupport of his lord, King Henry, and in pursuit of an ambition tostrengthen his southern frontier and expand into Maine, he fought aseries of campaigns against Geoffrey Martel, count of Anjou. But in 1052Henry and Geoffrey made peace, there was a serious rebellion in easternNormandy, and, until 1054 William was again in serious danger. Duringthis period he conducted important negotiations with his cousin Edwardthe Confessor, king of England, and took a wife.

Norman interest in Anglo-Saxon England derived from an alliance made in1002, when King Ethelred II of England married Emma, the sister of CountRichard II, William's grandfather. Two of her sons, William's cousinsonce removed, had reigned in turn in England, Hardecanute (1040-42) andEdward the Confessor (1042-66). William had met Edward during thatprince's exile on the Continent and may well have given him some supportwhen he returned to England in 1041. In that year Edward was about 36 andWilliam 14. It is clear that William expected some sort of reward fromEdward and, when Edward's marriage proved unfruitful, began to develop anambition to become his kinsman's heir. Edward probably at timesencouraged William's hopes. His childlessness was a diplomatic asset.

In 1049 William negotiated with Baldwin V of Flanders for the hand of hisdaughter, Matilda. Baldwin, an imperial vassal with a distinguishedlineage, was in rebellion against the Western emperor, Henry III, and indesperate need of allies. The proposed marriage was condemned asincestuous (William and Matilda were evidently related in some way) bythe Emperor's friend, Pope Leo IX, at the Council of Reims in October1049; but so anxious were the parties for the alliance that before theend of 1053, possibly in 1052, the wedding took place. In 1059 Williamwas reconciled to the papacy, and as penance the disobedient pair builttwo monasteries at Caen. Four sons were born to William and Matilda:Robert (the future duke of Normandy), Richard (who died young), WilliamRufus (the Conqueror's successor in England), and Henry (Rufus'successor). Among the daughters was Adela, who was the mother of Stephen,king of England.

Edward the Confessor was supporting the Emperor, and it is possible thatWilliam used his new alliance with Flanders to put pressure on Edward andextort an acknowledgment that he was the English king's heir. At allevents, Edward seems to have made some sort of promise to William in1051, while Tostig, son of the greatest nobleman in England, EarlGodwine, married Baldwin's half sister. The immediate purpose of thistripartite alliance was to improve the security of each of the parties.If William secured a declaration that he was Edward's heir, he was alsolooking very far ahead.

Between 1054 and 1060 William held his own against an alliance betweenKing Henry I and Geoffrey Martel of Anjou. Both men died in 1060 and weresucceeded by weaker rulers. As a result, in 1063 William was able toconquer Maine. In 1064 or 1065 Edward sent his brother-in-law, Harold,earl of Wessex, Godwine's son and successor, on an embassy to Normandy.William took him on a campaign into Brittany, and in connection with thisHarold swore an oath in which, according to Norman writers, he renewedEdward's bequest of the throne to William and promised to support it.

When Edward died childless on Jan. 5, 1066, Harold was accepted as kingby the English magnates, and William decided on war. Others, however,moved more quickly. In May Tostig, Harold's exiled brother, raidedEngland, and in September he joined the invasion forces of Harald IIIHardraade, king of Norway, off the Northumbrian coast. William assembleda fleet, recruited an army, and gathered his forces in August at themouth of the Dives River. It is likely that he originally intended tosail due north and invade England by way of the Isle of Wight andSouthampton Water. Such a plan would give him an offshore base andinterior lines. But adverse winds detained his fleet in harbour for amonth, and in September a westerly gale drove his ships up-Channel.

The Battle of Hastings.

William regrouped his forces at Saint-Valéry on the Somme. He hadsuffered a costly delay, some naval losses, and a drop in the morale ofhis troops. On September 27, after cold and rainy weather, the windbacked south. William embarked his army and set sail for the southeastcoast of England. The following morning he landed, took the unresistingtowns of Pevensey and Hastings, and began to organize a bridgehead withbetween 4,000 and 7,000 cavalry and infantry.

William's forces were in a narrow coastal strip, hemmed in by the greatforest of Andred, and, although this corridor was easily defensible, itwas not much of a base for the conquest of England. The campaigningseason was almost past, and when William received news of his opponent itwas not reassuring. On September 25 Harold had defeated and slain Tostigand Harald Hardraade at Stamford Bridge, near York, and was retracing hissteps to meet the new invader. On October 13, when Harold emerged fromthe forest, William was taken by surprise. But the hour was too late forHarold to push on to Hastings, and he took up a defensive position. Earlythe next day William went out to give battle. He attacked the Englishphalanx with archers and cavalry but saw his army almost driven from thefield. He rallied the fugitives, however, and brought them back into thefight and in the end wore down his opponents. Harold's brothers werekilled early in the battle. Toward nightfall the King himself fell andthe English gave up. William's coolness and tenacity secured him victoryin this fateful battle, and he then moved against possible centres ofresistance so quickly that he prevented a new leader from emerging. OnChristmas Day 1066 he was crowned king in Westminster Abbey. In a formalsense the Norman Conquest of England had taken place.

King of England

William was already an experienced ruler. In Normandy he had replaceddisloyal nobles and ducal servants with his own friends, limited privatewarfare, and recovered usurped ducal rights, defining the feudal dutiesof his vassals. The Norman church flourished under his rule. He wanted achurch free of corruption but subordinate to him. He would not tolerateopposition from bishops and abbots or interference from the papacy. Hepresided over church synods and reinforced ecclesiastical discipline withhis own. In supporting Lanfranc, prior of Bec, against Berengar of Toursin their dispute over the doctrine of the Eucharist, he found himself onthe side of orthodoxy. He was never guilty of the selling of churchoffice (simony). He disapproved of clerical marriage. At the same time hewas a stern and sometimes rough master, swayed by political necessities,and he was not generous to the church with his own property. The reformerLanfranc was one of his advisers; but perhaps even more to his taste werethe worldly and soldierly bishops Odo of Bayeux and Geoffrey ofCoutances.

William left England early in 1067 but had to return in December becauseof English unrest. The English rebellions that began in 1067 reachedtheir peak in 1069 and were finally quelled in 1071. They completed theruin of the highest English aristocracy and gave William a distaste forhis newly conquered kingdom. Since his position on the Continent wasdeteriorating, he wanted to solve English problems as cheaply aspossible. To secure England's frontiers, he invaded Scotland in 1072 andWales in 1081 and created special defensive "marcher" counties along theScottish and Welsh borders.

In the last 15 years of his life he was more often in Normandy than inEngland, and there were five years, possibly seven, in which he did notvisit the kingdom at all. He retained most of the greatest Anglo-Normanbarons with him in Normandy and confided the government of England tobishops, trusting especially his old friend Lanfranc, whom he madearchbishop of Canterbury. Much concerned that the natives should not beunnecessarily disturbed, he allowed them to retain their own laws andcourts.

William returned to England only when it was absolutely necessary: in1075 to deal with the aftermath of a rebellion by Roger, earl ofHereford, and Ralf, earl of Norfolk, which was made more dangerous by theintervention of a Danish fleet; and in 1082 to arrest and imprison hishalf brother Odo, bishop of Bayeux and earl of Kent, who was planning totake an army to Italy, perhaps to make himself pope. In the spring of1082 William had his son Henry knighted, and in August at Salisbury hetook oaths of fealty from all the important landowners in England,whosoever's vassals they might be. In 1085 he returned with a large armyto meet the threat of an invasion by Canute IV (Canute the Holy) ofDenmark. When this came to nothing owing to Canute's death in 1086,William ordered an economic and tenurial survey to be made of thekingdom, the results of which are summarized in the two volumes ofDomesday Book.

William was preoccupied with the frontiers of Normandy. The danger spotswere in Maine and the Vexin on the Seine, where Normandy bordered on theFrench royal demesne. After 1066 William's continental neighbours becamemore powerful and even more hostile. In 1068 Fulk the Surly succeeded toAnjou and in 1071 Robert the Frisian to Flanders. Philip I of Franceallied with Robert and Robert with the Danish king, Canute IV. There wasalso the problem of William's heir apparent, Robert Curthose, who, givenno appanage and seemingly kept short of money, left Normandy in 1077 andintrigued with his father's enemies. In 1081 William made a compromisewith Fulk in the treaty of Blancheland: Robert Curthose was to be countof Maine but as a vassal of the count of Anjou. The eastern part of theVexin, the county of Mantes, had fallen completely into King Philip'shands in 1077 when William had been busy with Maine. In 1087 Williamdemanded from Philip the return of the towns of Chaumont, Mantes, andPontoise. In July he entered Mantes by surprise, but while the townburned he suffered some injury from which he never recovered. He wasthwarted at the very moment when he seemed about to enforce his lastoutstanding territorial claim.

Death

William was taken to a suburb of Rouen, where he lay dying for fiveweeks. He had the assistance of some of his bishops and doctors, and inattendance were his half brother Robert, count of Mortain, and hisyounger sons, William Rufus and Henry. Robert Curthose was with the Kingof France. It had probably been his intention that Robert, as was thecustom, should succeed to the whole inheritance. In the circumstances hewas tempted to make the loyal Rufus his sole heir. In the end hecompromised: Normandy and Maine went to Robert and England to Rufus.Henry was given great treasure with which he could purchase an appanage.William died at daybreak on September 9, in his 60th year, and was buriedin rather unseemly fashion in St. Stephen's Church, which he had built atCaen. [Encyclopaedia Britannica CD, 1996, WILLIAM I]
                  
Matilda Maud of FLANDERS
Birth:
1032
Flanders, France
Death:
3 Nov 1083
Caen, Calvados, France
Burial:
Church of Holy Trinity, Caen
Sources:
The Magna Charta Sureties 1215, Frederick Lewis Weis, additions by WalterLee Sheppard Jr, 5th Edition, 1999, 161-9
Encyclopedia Britannica, Treatise on, Baldwin V
GEDCOM File : ~AT1255.ged
Notes:
                   For many years it was assumed that Gundred, who married William deWarrene, was a daughter of William I and Matilda (as indicated in ThePlantagenet Ancestry).  However it is now known that Gundred was adaughter of Gherbod the Fleming (as indicated in Ancestral Roots).  Thefollowing information strongly suggests that Gundred's mother was Matilda(thus the mistaken notion that she was daughter of William I).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
copied from Bill Crawford's ancestry: crawfolk data base on World ConnectProject, rootsweb.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Had Matilda of Flanders as many husbands as Adelaide, Countess ofPonthieu, and, like her, issue by each? What was the real cause of theinhibition of her marriage with William, Duke of Normandy,  its delayfor six years? What truth is there in the story of her unreturnedaffection for the Angio-Saxon Brihtric Meaw, and of her vindictiveconduct to him after she became Queen of England? I have hesitated tobelieve in the popular tradition that Duke William grossly assaulted thedaughter of Baldwin in the street or in her own chamber, not that I haveany doubt about his being capable of such an outrage, but because he wastoo politic to commit it, and she was not the woman to have forgiven it,assuming that the offence was the simple refusal of his hand on theground of his illegitimacy. It is obvious, however, that the early lifeof Matilda is involved in mystery, and it is highly probable that aclearer insight into it would enable us to account for much which we nowreject as legend, or fail to reconcile with acknowledged facts. If therebe any foundation for the story of William's brutality, the outburst ofungovernable fury might have been due to a much greater provocation thanhas been assigned for it. Brihtric, the son of Algar or Alfar, sumamedMeaw (Snow), from the extreme fairness of his complexion, an Anglo-SaxonThegn, possessor of large domains in England, had been sent on an embassyfrom King Edward the Confessor to the Connt of Flanders. Matilda, we aretold, fell desperately in love with him, and offered herself to him inmarriage Either disgusted by her forwardness, or preferring another, hedeclined the flattering proposal. "Hell hath no fury like a womanfoiled," and she kept her wrath warm till she was in a position to ruinthe man she had so passionately loved. She had no sooner become the Queenof England than she induced William to confiscate, on some pretence, allBrihtric's estates, and obtained the greater proportion for herself. Theunfortunate Thegn was arrested at his house at Hanley, in Worcestershire,on the very day Saint Wulfstan had consecrated a chapel of his building,dragged to Winchester, and died in a dungeon The truth of this story issupported by the impartial evidence of Domesday, in which Hanley and theprincipal manors held by Brihtric in the time of King Edward are recordedas the possessions of Queen Matilda, and the remainder passed to FitzHamon.

After her hand had been rejected by the noble Saxon, it is presumed shebecame the wife of a Fleming, named Gherbod, who appears to have held thehereditary office of Advocate of the Abbey of Saint Bertin, in St. Omers,and by whom she had at least two children, viz., Gherbod, to whom Williamgave the earldom of Chester, and Gundred, "the sister of Gherbod," andwife of William de Warren. Was this a clandestine or an informalmarriage, which, as it has never been acknowledged by any chronicler,contemporary or other, might have been unknown to the Duke of Normandy,when he proposed to one whom he believed to be the maiden daughter of theCount of Flanders, and the corporal chastisement inflicted, howeverunworthy of a man, passed over, sub silentio, for prudential reasons, bythe parties wlio had been guilty of a disgraceful suppression of facts?The subsequent marriage under such circumstances will awaken no surprisein any one who has studied the character of William. Utterlyunscrupulous, destitute of every generous, noble, or delicate feeling,every action of his life was dictated by POLICY alone. An alliance withthe Count of Flanders might be considered by the crafty schemersufficiently advantageous to warrant his overlooking any objectionableantecedents in the conduct of a granddaughter of a king of France, hisfirst discovery of which had provoked his savage nature into a momentaryebullition of fury. Her being the mother of two children was a point inher favour with a man whose sole motive for marrying was the perpetuationof a dynasty, and the fair prospect of legitimate issue, in whose veinsthe blood of the Capets should enrich that of the Furrier of Falaise,would overcome any hesitation at espousing the widow of an Advocate ofSt. Bertin. On the other hand, Count Baldwin would be too happy toembrace the opportunity of reinstating his daughter in a positionbefitting her birth, and, as well as the lady herself, gladly condonepast insults for future advantages and the hope of smothering, in thesplendour of a ducal wedding, the awkward whispers of scandal.

I have said thus much simply to show the view that may be taken of thesemysterious circumstances, in opposition to the rose-colouredrepresentations of some modern historians, who, upon no strongerevidence, elevate the Conqueror into a model husband, and describeMatilda as the perfection of womankind.
                  
Children
Marriage
1
Robert II "Curthose" Duke of NORMANDY
Birth:
Abt 1054
Normandy, France
Death:
2 Oct 1134
Cardiff Castle, Glamorganshire, Wales
 
Marr:
 
2
Adela Princess of ENGLAND
Birth:
Abt 1062
of Normandy, France
Death:
8 Mar 1136/37
 
Marr:
 
Notes:
                   Adela, French ADÉLE (b. 1062?--d. 1137), daughter of William I theConqueror of England and his wife, Matilda of Flanders, and mother ofStephen, king of England, whose right to the throne derived through her.She was married to Stephen, earl of Meaux and Brie, in 1080 at Breteuil.Upon the death of his father in 1090, her husband succeeded to theearldom of Blois and Chartres. She appears to have played an active rolein the administration of her husband's lands, regularly witnessing hischarters, took an active interest in civil and ecclesiastical affairs,and was instrumental in rebuilding the catherdral of Chartres in stone.Having inherited her father's appetite and ability to rule, she becameregent in 1095 when she persuaded her popular but weak-willed husband tojoin the First Crusade to the Holy Land. Although in charge of thecentral funds of the Crusade, Stephen deserted at Antioch in 1098,understandably enough in face of overwhelming odds. Unfortunately for hisreputation, the crusaders survived and succeeded in capturing Jerusalemin 1099. After Stephen's return home in 1099, Adela waged a sustainedcampaign of bullying and moral blackmail that extended into their bedroomwhere, between intercourse, she would urge Stephen to think of hisreputation and return to the Holy Land. In the end, her nagging workedand Stephen departed east once more in 1101, to meet a satisfactorilynoble death at Ramlah in 1102. No longer a coward's wife but morecongenially a hero's widow, Adela continued to rule Blois-Chartres duringthe minority of her sons. Anselm, her guest and teacher in 1097, wasoften entertained by her during 1103 and 1105 and she affected atemporary reconciliation between him and her brother, Henry I, wholavished patronage on her second son, Stephen, and appointed a third,Henry, bishop of Winchester, the richest see in England. In 1107 Adelaentertained Pope Pascal during Easter and in the following year washostess to Bohemund of Antioch. She made her son Theobald her successorin 1109, and persuaded him to join her brother Henry I against France in1117. In 1120 she retired to the abbey of Marcigny-sur-Loire where shedied in 1137. By all accounts a forceful personality, Adela's qualitieswere not uncommon among women artistocrats, although more often theyfound an outlet in the running of nunneries. Adela's secular career, asde facto ruler for more than a decade of one of the most powerfulprincipalities of northern France, is exceptional testimony to the powerof breeding as well as to her own determination. She was a benevolentpatroness of churches and monasteries. Although married to a French countand living to see a son crowned king of England, she chose to be buriedbeside her mother at Caen under an inscription 'Adela, filia regis'. Shewas always the Conqueror's daughter. [Sources: Who's Who in EarlyMedieval England, Christopher Tyerman, Shepheard-Walwyn, Ltd., London,1996; Encyclopædia Britannica CD, 1997]
                  
3
Birth:
1068
Selby, Yorkshire, England
Death:
1 Dec 1135
Lyons-La-Foret, Normandy, France
Marr:
29 Jan 1120/21
Windsor Castle, Berkshire, Eng 
Notes:
                   Henry I was born in the year 1068---a factor he himself regarded ashighly significant, for he was the only son of the Conqueror born afterthe conquest of England, and to Henry this meant he was heir to thethrone. He was not an attractive proposition: he was dissolute to adegree, producing at least a score of bastards; but far worse he wasprone to sadistic cruelty---on one occasion, for example, personallypunishing a rebellious burgher by throwing him from the walls of histown.

At the death of William the Conqueror, Henry was left no lands, merely5,000 pounds of silver. With these he bought lands from his elder brotherRobert Curthose, Duke of Normandy, only to see them taken back again afew years later by Robert, in unholy alliance with his brother WilliamRufus.

Henry could do little to avenge such treatment, but in England he foundnumerous barons who were tired of the exactions and ambitions of theirking. He formed alliances with some of these, notably with the importantde Clare family. He and some of the de Clares were with William Rufus onhis last hunting expedition, and it is thought that the king's death wasthe result of Henry's plotting.

Certainly he moved fast to take advantage of it; leaving Rufus's bodyunattended in the woods, he swooped down on Winchester to take control ofthe treasury. Two days later he was in Westminster, being crowned by theBishop of London. His speed is understandable when one realises that hiselder brother, Robert [Curthose], was returning from the crusade, andclaimed, with good reason, to be the true heir.

Henry showed great good sense in his first actions as King. He arrestedRanulph Flambard, William's tax-gatherer, and recalled Anselm, the exiledArchbishop. Furthermore, he issued a Charter of Liberties which promisedspeedy redress of grievances, and a return to the good government of theConqueror. Putting aside for the moment his many mistresses, he marriedthe sister of the King of Scots, who was descended from the royal line ofWessex; and lest the Norman barons should think him too pro-English inthis action, he changed her name from Edith to Matilda. No one couldclaim that he did not aim to please.

In 1101 Robert Curthose invaded, but Henry met him at Alton, andpersuaded him to go away again by promising him an annuity of 2,000. Hehad no intention of keeping up the payments, but the problem wastemporarily solved.

He now felt strong enough to move against dissident barons who might givetrouble in the future. Chief amongst these was the vicious Robert ofBellême, Earl of Shrewsbury, whom Henry had known for many years as adangerous troublemaker. He set up a number of charges against him in theking's court, making it plain that if he appeared for trial he would beconvicted and imprisoned. Thus Robert and his colleagues were forced intorebellion at a time not of their own choosing, were easily defeated andsent scuttling back to Normandy.

In Normandy Robert Curthose began to wreak his wrath on all connectedwith his brother, thus giving Henry an excellent chance to retaliate withcharges of misgovernment and invade. He made two expeditions in 1104-5,before the great expedition of 1106 on which Robert was defeated at thehour-long battle of Tinchebrai, on the anniversary of Hastings. No onehad expected such an easy victory, but Henry took advantage of the stateof shock resulting from the battle to annex Normandy. Robert wasimprisoned (in some comfort, it be said); he lived on for 28 more years,ending up in Cardiff castle whiling away the long hours learning Welsh.His son William Clito remained a free agent, to plague Henry for most ofthe rest of his reign.

In England the struggle with Anselm over the homage of bishops ran itscourse until the settlement of 1107. In matters of secular governmentlife was more simple: Henry had found a brilliant administrator, Roger ofSalisbury, to act as Justiciar for him. Roger had an inventive mind, akeen grasp of affairs, and the ability to single out young men ofpromise. He quickly built up a highly efficient team of administrators,and established new routines and forms of organisation within which theycould work. To him we owe the Exchequer and its recording system of thePipe Rolls, the circuits of royal justiciars spreading the king's peace,and the attempts at codification of law. Henry's good relationships withhis barons, and with the burgeoning new towns owed much to skilfuladministration. Certainly he was able to gain a larger and more reliablerevenue this way than by the crude extortion his brother had used.

In 1120 came the tragedy of the White Ship. The court was returning toEngland, and the finest ship in the land was filled with its young men,including Henry's son and heir William. Riotously drunk, they tried to gofaster and faster, when suddenly the ship foundered. All hands except abutcher of Rouen were lost, and England was without an heir.

Henry's only legitimate child was Matilda, but she was married to theEmperor Henry V of Germany, and so could not succeed. But in 1125 herhusband died, and Henry brought her home and forced the barons to swearfealty to her---though they did not like the prospect of a woman ruler.Henry then married her to Geoffrey of Anjou, the Normans' traditionalenemy, and the barons were less happy---especially when the newly-wedshad a terrible row, and Geoffrey ordered her out of his lands. In 1131Henry, absolutely determined, forced the barons to swear fealty oncemore, and the fact that they did so is testimoney of his controllingpower. Matilda and Geoffrey were reunited, and in 1133 she produced a sonwhom she named for his grandfather. If only Henry could live on until hisgrandson was old enough to rule, all would be well.

But in 1135, against doctor's orders, he ate a hearty meal of lampreys,got acute indigestion, which turned into fever, and died. He was buriedat his abbey in Reading---some said in a silver coffin, for which therewas an unsuccessful search at the Dissolution. [Source: Who's Who in theMiddle Ages, John Fines, Barnes & Noble Books, New York, 1995]
                  
FamilyCentral Network
William I "the Conqueror" King of England - Matilda Maud of Flanders

William I "the Conqueror" King of England was born at Falais, Calvados, France 14 Oct 1027. His parents were Robert I "the Magnificent" Duke of Normandy and Arlette Herleve de Falaise.

He married Matilda Maud of Flanders Abt 1053 at Eu, Seine-Inferieure, France . Matilda Maud of Flanders was born at Flanders, France 1032 daughter of Baudouin V Count of Flanders and Aelis Adele Princess of France .

They were the parents of 3 children:
Robert II "Curthose" Duke of Normandy born Abt 1054.
Adela Princess of England born Abt 1062.
Henry I "Beauclerc" King of England born 1068.

William I "the Conqueror" King of England died 9 Sep 1087 at Hermenbraville, Seine-Maritime, France .

Matilda Maud of Flanders died 3 Nov 1083 at Caen, Calvados, France .